近场爆炸作用下预制节段RC桥墩的动力行为

DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PRECAST SEGMENTAL RC PIER UNDER CLOSE-IN BLAST LOADING

  • 摘要: 蓄意或偶然性爆炸可导致桥墩严重损毁甚至桥梁整体倒塌,现有桥墩抗爆研究主要针对现浇整体式桥墩,关于预制节段RC(PSRC)桥墩抗爆性能的研究较少。针对新疆和若铁路桥梁PSRC桥墩遭受近场爆炸开展了数值模拟分析。基于PSRC和现浇整体式桥墩试件的野外爆炸试验,通过对比桥墩破坏形态和侧向挠度响应,对采用的数值模拟方法,如结构化任意拉格朗日-欧拉法、预应力施加方法以及材料模型和参数等,进行了充分验证;建立了和若铁路桥梁原型PSRC桥墩的精细化有限元模型,并对美国联邦应急管理署规定的小型货车炸弹爆炸作用下桥墩的破坏形态和动态响应进行分析;进一步讨论了节段数量、初始预应力大小、剪力键和耗能钢筋,以及爆炸距离对PSRC桥墩抗爆性能的影响。上述爆炸工况表明:预制整体式桥墩的抗爆性能优于PSRC桥墩,其次为现浇整体式桥墩,其原因在于现浇整体式桥墩易发生局部剪切破坏,从而导致桥墩丧失承载力,且PSRC桥墩顶部两个节段接缝处易发生严重的混凝土压碎破坏,降低桥墩整体侧向刚度;减小爆炸距离或增加节段数量均会加重PSRC桥墩顶部两个节段接缝处的混凝土压碎程度;增大初始预应力可以有效减小PSRC桥墩的侧向挠度,但同时加重了桥墩底部迎爆面混凝土的破碎程度;剪力键可显著增强5节段PSRC桥墩的侧向刚度,并减弱接缝处的混凝土压碎破坏;耗能钢筋对于提升PSRC桥墩抗爆性能的作用不明显。

     

    Abstract: Intentional or accidental explosions can result in severe damage to bridge piers or even collapse of the entire bridge. Existing studies concerning the blast-resistant performance of pier mainly focus on cast-in-situ monolithic piers, with few studies concentrating on precast segmental reinforced concrete (PSRC) piers. Numerical simulation analysis was conducted on the PSRC pier of He-Ruo Railway Bridge in Xinjiang under close-in blast loading. Based on the field explosion tests of PSRC and cast-in-situ monolithic pier specimens, the adopted numerical simulation methods,i.e., the Structured Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method, the prestress application method, the material models and parameters, were thoroughly validated by comparing the pier damage modes and lateral deflection responses. The refined finite element (FE) model of the prototype PSRC pier of He-Ruo Railway Bridge was established. The failure mode and dynamic response of the pier under the explosion of a small moving van bomb specified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency were studied. Furthermore, the influence of the segment number, the initial prestress amplitude, the adoption of shear keys and energy dissipation bars, as well as the standoff distance on the blast-resistant performance of PSRC pier were discussed. The above explosion scenarios indicate that: The precast monolithic pier has better blast-resistant performance than the PSRC pier followed by the cast-in-situ monolithic pier becasue the cast-in-situ monolithic pier is prone to the local shear failure, leading to loss of bearing capacity of the pier. Besides, the joint between the two segments at the top of PSRC pier is susceptible to serious concrete crushing damage, which reduces the overall lateral stiffness of the pier; Either reducing the standoff distance or increasing the number of segments will cause more severe concrete crushing damage to the joint between the two segments at the top of PSRC pier; Increasing the initial prestress can effectively reduce the lateral deflection of PSRC pier, meanwhile exacerbate concrete crushing damage to the blast face at the bottom of the pier; Shear keys can significantly enhance the lateral stiffness of the 5-segment PSRC pier, and reduce the concrete crushing damage to the joints; The effect of energy dissipation bars in improving the blast-resistant performance of PSRC pier is not obvious.

     

/

返回文章
返回