桥隧过渡段移动列车长度对车体气动特性的影响

THE INFLUENCE OF TRAIN LENGTH ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MOVING TRAINS THROUGH BRIDGES-TUNNEL JUNCTIONS

  • 摘要: 相比静止列车风洞试验,移动列车模型试验能实现对列车气动特性更为准确识别,但受试验装置、场地等条件的限制,某些列车模型参数(如模型长度)尚无法完全精确反映真实运营场景。为研究列车模型长度对横风下列车驶过桥隧过渡段时列车气动特性的影响,指导试验模型长度的选取,该文采用LES模型和动网格技术建立了横风下桥隧过渡段移动列车CFD数值仿真模型,并通过移动列车动模型试验验证了数值仿真模型的正确性,对比分析了单节列车模型、单节列车加半节补偿段模型及三车编组模型在通过桥隧过渡段时的气动性能和流场结构,验证了单节列车加半节车长补偿段模型在限制试验条件下替代三车编组模型的可行性。结果显示:增加半节车长补偿段可以有效提高列车模型头车气动力系数与三车编组模型的相似度,除阻力系数误差均较大外,单节列车模型在桥梁段气动力系数的误差是增加补偿段后结果误差的1.7倍~6.3倍,且增加补偿段可以将单车模型隧道内平均气动力系数结果与三车编组结果的误差减小47%以上。列车压力系数也呈现出同样的趋势,不同的是,三车编组模型和增加补偿段后的模型在进洞过程中,列车压力系数能在洞内一段距离内保持在0附近,且其距离随列车长度增加而增加。但三种模型进洞压力系数下降幅值基本相同,扣除稳定段后,下降速率基本一致,出洞的变化规律也相似。因此在限制的试验条件下,单节列车模型增加半节补偿段可以代替模拟三车编组进行使用。

     

    Abstract: Compared with stationary train wind tunnel test, moving train model test can realize more accurate identification of train aerodynamic characteristics. However, some train model parameters (such as model length) cannot fully reflect the real operation scenario due to some limitations of test equipment, site and other conditions. In order to study the effect of train model length on the aerodynamic characteristics of trains passing through bridges-tunnel junctions under cross wind for selection of train length in wind tunnel test, the LES model and dynamic mesh are adopted in this paper to establish the CFD simulation model of moving trains passing through the bridge-tunnel junction under cross wind. The simulation results are verified by the moving train model test. The aerodynamic performances of the trains with different lengths are analyzed, and the flow field around the vehicle is also examined. In some restricted test conditions, the one-car plus half-car length compensation section model can replace the three-car train model. The results show that the similarity between the aerodynamic coefficient of the head car of single-car train model and that of the three-car train model can be effectively improved by adding a half-car length compensation section. In addition to the large error in drag force coefficient, the error of the average aerodynamic force coefficients between the one-car model and the three-car model running on the bridge section is 1.7 to 6.3 times that of the results after adding the compensating section, and the error of the results when the train running in the tunnel can be reduced by more than 47% by adding a compensating section. The same trend is observed for the train pressure coefficient. The difference is that for the three-car formation model and the model with additional compensation section, the pressure coefficient during the train's entry into the tunnel can be maintained near 0 for a certain distance in the tunnel, and its distance increases with the train length. However, the decreasing amplitude of the pressure coefficient of the three models during entering tunnel portal is similar; after subtracting the stable section, the decreasing rates are basically the same, and the change patterns at the exit are also similar. Therefore, under limited test conditions, the addition of half compensation section in the single-car train model can replace the simulated three-car formation.

     

/

返回文章
返回