转子非线性响应计算的改进单步块精细积分法

IMPROVED ONE-STEP BLOCK PRECISE INTEGRATION METHOD FOR ROTOR NONLINEAR RESPONSE CALCULATION

  • 摘要: 在非线性问题的求解中,单步块精细积分法采用Runge-Kutta法预估积分内点载荷项,导致计算量较大。针对该问题提出一种改进的单步块精细积分算法,通过子块细分计算对Duhamel积分部分及内点载荷预估部分进行精细化矩阵向量运算。通过避免零矩阵与单位矩阵的运算,同时提前存储恒定矩阵的计算结果,减少了约百分之二十的计算量,且仅计算形式变化,精度与原算法一致。将改进的单步块精细积分法应用到含非线性支承的转子系统中计算转子非线性动响应,并与原单步块精细积分法和广泛应用的Newmark法计算结果进行对比;同时,利用实验结果对改进算法的可靠性进行验证。结果表明:与原单步块方法相比,改进的单步块精细积分法计算效率得到了显著提升;在复杂转子模型算例中,改进的单步块精细积分法在30 000 r/min转速下精度与Newmark相仿,在30 000 r/min以上的高转速范围内精度显著高于Newmark法,且在计算效率上具有优势。此外,仿真与实验结果具有一致性,证明改进算法有效可靠。

     

    Abstract: In the solution of nonlinear problems, Runge-Kutta method is used to predict the integral interior point load term in the one-step block precise integration method, resulting in a large amount of calculation. Thusly, an improved single step block precise integration algorithm is proposed. The Duhamel integration part and the interior point load prediction part are calculated with refined matrix vector operations through the subblock subdivision calculation. By avoiding the operation of zero and identity matrices, and by storing the calculation results of constant matrix in advance, the calculation complexity is reduced by approximately 20%, only the calculation form changed, and the accuracy is consistent with the original algorithm. The single step block precise integration method improved is applied to the rotor system with nonlinear support to calculate the nonlinear dynamic response of the rotor, and the results are compared with those obtained by the original single step block precise integration method and by Newmark method used widely. Meanwhile, the reliability of the algorithm improved is verified by using experimental results. The result shows that the computational efficiency of the one step block precise integration method improved is significantly improved, compared with the original one step block method. In the complex model calculation example, the accuracy of the single step block precise method improved has similar to that of Newmark method below the speed of 30000 r/min, is significantly higher than that of Newmark method above the speed of 30000 r/min, and has advantages in calculation efficiency. Besides, the consistency between simulation and experimental results proves the effectiveness and reliability of the algorithm improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回